I'm willing to explore a wide range of exotic, erotic possibilities, except the grossly perverted &/or obsessively deranged--no serious pain (a little pain can be fun, as long as it doesn't hurt), no forced anything, no humiliation, and please be housebroken. We'll always be respectful and compassionate as we trip the light fandango and turn cartwheels 'cross the floor. Right? I'm willing to travel and have a flexible schedule which allows me to do so. What else? I’m decidedly bohemian in lifestyle and attitude (the arts, espresso, jazz, social justice, spoken word/performance poetry, etc.) Also, well-traveled, politically aware, educated, sophisticated, and tolerant of others' tastes and choices, but don't suffer fools easily. I can be hopelessly romantic while maintaining a sharp cynical edge. (paradox rocks) Note: There is lovemaking that is bad for a person, just as there is eating that is bad. That boysenberry cream pie from the Thrift-E Mart may appear inviting, may, in fact, cause all nine hundred taste buds to carol from the tongue, but in the end, the sugars, the additives, the empty calories clog the arteries, disrupt cells, generate fat, and rot teeth. Even potentially nourishing foods can be improperly prepared. There are wrong combinations and improper preparations in sex as well. Yes, one must prepare for a fuck -- the way an enlightened priest prepares to celebrate mass, the way a great matador prepares for the ring: with intensification, with purification, with a conscious summoning of sacred power. And even that won't work if the ingredients are poorly matched: oysters are delectable, so are strawberries, but mashed together...(?!) Every nutritious sexual recipe calls for at least a pinch of love, and the fucks that rate four-star rankings from both gourmets and health food nuts use cupfuls. Not that sex should be regarded as therapeutic or to be taken for medicinal purposes -- only a dullard would hang such a millstone around the nibbled neck of a lay -- but to approach sex carelessly, shallowly, with detachment and without warmth is to dine night after night in erotic greasy spoons. In time, one's palate will become insensitive, one will suffer (without knowing it) emotional malnutrition, the skin of the soul will fester with scurvy, the teeth of the heart will decay. Neither duration nor proclamation of commitment is necessarily the measure -- there are ephemeral explosions of passion between strangers that make more erotic sense than six-month affairs in Paris -- but finally there is a commitment, however brief; a purity, however threatened; a vulnerability, however concealed; a generosity of spirit, however marbled with need; an honest CARING, however singed by lust, that must be present if couplings are to be salubrious and not slow poison. STANDARD MEMBERS ALLOWED!

My Ideal Person I’m looking for an attractive, creative, funny, funky, smart, seriously sexy & sensual sweetheart with whom to wile away the time until McKenna's predicted Novelty Event, affirmed by the Mayan calendar, sends us all ass over teacup on 12-21-2012. (kidding? maybe. ever heard of Peak Oil? Dinosaurs?)
What kind of relationship?
a) Long term with committment, monogamous or otherwise?
b) Shorter term with emotional bonding?
c) No attachment, for recreation only?
Any of the above is possible.

What are your favorite musicians or bands?:
Far Too Many to name and assign rank

Tell one of your favorite sexual fantasies. Don't hold back!:
It involves the Broadway cast of Cats, a huge bowl of thick
cream, a certain Redheaded siren, and Janine Lindemulder.

What types of sexual activities turn you on?:
Giving Oral Sex, Receiving Oral Sex, Anal Sex, Toys (Vibrators/Dildos/etc.), Mutual Masturbation, the occasional smack on the ass

Ever fantasized about having sex with a celebrity? Who? What turns you on about them?:
Cameron Diaz, Charlize Theron, Salma Hyack, and The Chanel
Twins have their way with me all through an entire season
of Survivor, which is then renewed for another 13 week run.

Have you ever had cybersex?:
I've tried it, but it's just not the same.

View more of rm_YoBasta's responses